 | | | | | |
Is there any support for non square stud groups? Some of of the obvious ones
would be 1X4, 1X6, 1X8, and 1X16.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Mark Kennedy wrote:
> Is there any support for non square stud groups? Some of of the obvious ones
> would be 1X4, 1X6, 1X8, and 1X16.
My girlfriend thinks I'm a non-squre stud.
Sorry. Couldn't resist. It's a quarter till 2am. I don't know why I'm up.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Mark Kennedy wrote:
> Is there any support for non square stud groups? Some of of the obvious ones
> would be 1X4, 1X6, 1X8, and 1X16.
Search for "stug" and you'll find some threads about this.
The biggest problem I see is one of confusion and consequent complication. Due
to stud orientation you cannot rotate a 1x4 stud group by 90 degrees to get a
4x1 stud group - so you need both. The question is then which one to use. Use
the wrong one in a complex stud pattern and it will take a lot of work to
re-orientate the studs.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Mark Kennedy wrote:
> Is there any support for non square stud groups? Some of of the obvious ones
> would be 1X4, 1X6, 1X8, and 1X16.
Search for "stug" and you'll find some threads about this.
The biggest problem I see is one of confusion and consequent complication. Due
to stud orientation you cannot rotate a 1x4 stud group by 90 degrees to get a
4x1 stud group - so you need both. The question is then which one to use. Use
the wrong one in a complex stud pattern and it will take a lot of work to
re-orientate the studs.
| | | | | | |
