| |
> > Just out of curiousity, what are these two?
>
> Sorry, it was a false alarm. There are no duplicated primitives. AFAIK.
>
> Steve
That makes me feel better, becuase I was the one who submitted those two
primitves. We should probably come to some sort of FORMAL decision as to wether
to use the old ringX name or move them all into 4-4ringX primitives.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: duplicate primitives?
|
| (...) I think we should move to using the 4-4ringX nomenclature. a) Copy RINGx.DAT (x=1,2,3,4,7) to 4-4RINGx and RING10.DAT to 4-4RIN10.DAT, replacing with ~moved-to files. b) Make the PT reject new submissions that use the old names? c) Automated (...) (23 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
Message is in Reply To:
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
