To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.partsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 5552
5551  |  5553
Subject: 
Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Sun, 12 Dec 2004 19:29:13 GMT
Viewed: 
4589 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Willy Tschager wrote:
Hi folks,

I overhauled the Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern - 3754p90.dat.¬

<<http://www.holly-wood.it/images/3754p90.gif>>

Although this is the re-engineering of an existing LEGO part, it will NOT be¬
submitted to the LDraw Parts Tracker for certification. It would never make¬
it through the certification process, because the dithered color 257 hasn't¬
been separated into a subpart for being backwards compatible with Ldraw
0.27.¬¬ In fact I don't want my parts any longer compatible with an 8 years
old¬ DOS-prog I haven't ever used. The pattern looks fine in MLCad, LDView
and¬ L3Lab; also the Povray-rendering through LPub didn't cause any trouble -
that's¬ all I want. It's no news that the more subparts a part uses the long
it will¬ take to go through certification. Subfiling in order to reducing
file size is¬ fine - to work around the color issue of an outdated prog, with
many¬ and better alternatives available, definitely not.¬
¬
Therefore please download it from
my personal website¬ <www.holly-wood.it/ldraw/authored-en.html>.¬

Bye, w.


Willy,

You really got a good point here.
I don't know if there is anyone that still uses original LDraw. And, I don't
think the LDraw parts library is LDraw compatible anyway. At least not running
under DOS - I think there was a limit of 2000 files in a folder, and the Parts
directory is much larger than that, almost 3000 files.

The critical question in preserving subfiling dithered colours is: Are there
still users of original LDraw?

And, even if answered with a 'yes', we could easily make a DOS utility that
splits those parts into subparts for the few(?) who need it.

I'd say, either way, we can quit subfiling dithered colours.

(Hmm, well, we could have a META tag in the header saying that "this part
contains dithered colors" to help that utility skip scanning those part files
without that tag, like "0 COMPABILITY DITHERED_COLORS" or something shorter...
)


/Tore



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
 
(...) IIRC, the limit was only on the size of the root directory -- but I could well be wrong. I think there are two separate, and related, questions here: Do we want to keep supporting DOS as a platform? Do we want to keep supporting LDraw 0.27? (...) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
 
Hi folks, I overhauled the Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern - 3754p90.dat. (URL) Although this is the re-engineering of an existing LEGO part, it will NOT be submitted to the LDraw Parts Tracker for certification. It would never make it (...) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)  

16 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR