 | | | | | |
In lugnet.cad, Michael Horvath wrote:
> Would it be safe to simply replace 606p01b.dat with 606p01.dat?
>
> Mike
I've checked this out now, and you can't replace 606p01b.dat with 606p01.dat. It
will not come out with the same colors, regardless which main color you use in
the calling Type 1 line.
/Tore
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
On 11/22/2009 7:03 PM, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> I've checked this out now, and you can't replace 606p01b.dat with 606p01.dat. It
> will not come out with the same colors, regardless which main color you use in
> the calling Type 1 line.
>
> /Tore
Is it an official part? Why isn't it included with the official
distribution?
Mike
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.cad, Michael Horvath wrote:
> On 11/22/2009 7:03 PM, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> > I've checked this out now, and you can't replace 606p01b.dat with 606p01.dat. It
> > will not come out with the same colors, regardless which main color you use in
> > the calling Type 1 line.
> >
> > /Tore
>
> Is it an official part?
After searching Peeron and BrickLink, I think that this is not a real LEGO part.
There are more of them in Datsville.
> Why isn't it included with the official distribution?
If it is an existing LEGO part (which I tend to doubt), the .dat file may not
have been submitted to the Tracker. Those two x772p???.dat parts must be made
from existing LEGO parts, but I don't think anyone has made a better version of
them yet to submit to the Tracker.
/Tore
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
In lugnet.cad, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Michael Horvath wrote:
> > On 11/22/2009 7:03 PM, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> > > I've checked this out now, and you can't replace 606p01b.dat with 606p01.dat. It
> > > will not come out with the same colors, regardless which main color you use in
> > > the calling Type 1 line.
> > >
> > > /Tore
> >
> > Is it an official part?
>
> After searching Peeron and BrickLink, I think that this is not a real LEGO part.
> There are more of them in Datsville.
>
> > Why isn't it included with the official distribution?
>
> If it is an existing LEGO part (which I tend to doubt), the .dat file may not
> have been submitted to the Tracker. Those two x772p???.dat parts must be made
> from existing LEGO parts, but I don't think anyone has made a better version of
> them yet to submit to the Tracker.
>
> /Tore
Maybe we can replace them after all. Look at this picture:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/40764264@N02/4405232940/
The orange poles indicate the occurances of x606p01b.dat. They are all in
undeveloped areas, so I think it's possible to replace them with other
roadplates.
/Tore
| | | | | | |
