Subject:
|
Re: Part review coplanarity check
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:47:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4754 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Jim DeVona wrote:
> As a rookie part reviewer, I'd like to check whether I understand the
> guidelines for this situation before casting a vote.
>
> The <http://www.ldraw.org/library/tracker/ref/l3pmsg/#note2 L3P -check guide>
> suggests different coplanarity determinant test thresholds for general files
> (0.1) and primitives (0.01 or 0.001).
Hello Jim,
L3P coplanarity checks have some problems (they depend on the size of polygon,
some explainations here: http://www.philohome.com/isecalc/planarcheck.htm). So
coplanarity criteria has been updated
(http://www.ldraw.org/Article512.html#coplanar) but guidelines were not. So the
tool to use is Planarcheck.
Philo
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Part review coplanarity check
|
| (...) Hi Philo, Ah - thanks for the clarification. Now I know what to do with one of those program I compiled! Bit by bit I am figuring out the review procedure. Jim (16 years ago, 15-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Part review coplanarity check
|
| As a rookie part reviewer, I'd like to check whether I understand the guidelines for this situation before casting a vote. The (URL) L3P -check guide> suggests different coplanarity determinant test thresholds for general files (0.1) and primitives (...) (16 years ago, 15-Jun-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
