 | | | | | |
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss wrote:
> Oops, I missed replying to one point.
>
> In lugnet.cad, Carl Nelson wrote:
> > My reservation about doing it this way is that it is exclusively tied to a
> > reflection matrix of (-1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1)--please see my response to your
> > 2nd message.
>
> If you mean (-1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1) as the 'default' matrix, my response is:
> that default matrix works for *any* reflection across any arbitrary plane.
>
> If you mean (-1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1) as the reflection matrix, my response is:
> Don's algorithm works for *any* reflection across any arbitrary plane.
Uh, I thought we were refering to it as "Steve's algorithm". Are you
having 2nd thoughts? ;^)
Enjoy,
Don
PS. Why am I constantly seeing really long lines in the browser for this
thread. It makes things really hard to read when I have to scroll 2
miles to the right.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.cad, Don Heyse wrote:
> Uh, I thought we were refering to it as "Steve's algorithm". Are you
> having 2nd thoughts? ;^)
Sorry, I should have said "Don's pseudo-code". ;)
> PS. Why am I constantly seeing really long lines in the browser for this
> thread. It makes things really hard to read when I have to scroll 2
> miles to the right.
I don't know - I'm replying via the web interface, posting with plain text.
| | | | | | |
