To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.schleimOpen lugnet.build.schleim in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Schleim / 473
Subject: 
Re: Hinge wall alignment
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.schleim
Date: 
Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:33:00 GMT
Viewed: 
7607 times
  
In lugnet.build.schleim, I wrote:
  
   For the sake of completeness, it’s worth to mention this technique not only works for any length, but also for any width of plate/brick. In other words, you’re able to slant ? x 2, ? x 4 and so on by mirroring along the diagonal as well, using an equally larger parallel ofsett.

In lugnet.build.schleim, Ross Crawford answered:

   Indeed. Wider bricks/plates do result in a correspondingly larger gap though.

...that can be filled adequately by tiles or plates + tiles attached snotwise.

(Oops, I just realised I’ve put this thread back on-topic, because up until now the discussion was most about studs on top techniques. :-)

With friendly greetings, M, Moolhuysen.


Subject: 
Re: Hinge wall alignment
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.schleim
Date: 
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:51:07 GMT
Viewed: 
7807 times
  
In lugnet.build.schleim, Manfred Moolhuysen wrote:
   In lugnet.build.schleim, I wrote:
  
   For the sake of completeness, it’s worth to mention this technique not only works for any length, but also for any width of plate/brick. In other words, you’re able to slant ? x 2, ? x 4 and so on by mirroring along the diagonal as well, using an equally larger parallel ofsett.

In lugnet.build.schleim, Ross Crawford answered:

   Indeed. Wider bricks/plates do result in a correspondingly larger gap though.

...that can be filled adequately by tiles or plates + tiles attached snotwise.

(Oops, I just realised I’ve put this thread back on-topic, because up until now the discussion was most about studs on top techniques. :-)

With friendly greetings, M, Moolhuysen.

Yes, but the studs were out of aschlignment. And we can talk about scheep if we want to...

Anyway, the new 1x1 ‘cheeser’ slopes would be best to pad the gap, if it was the right size.

Jason R


Subject: 
Re: Hinge wall alignment
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.schleim
Date: 
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:47:05 GMT
Viewed: 
7968 times
  
In lugnet.build.schleim, Jason J Railton wrote:
   Yes, but the studs were out of aschlignment. And we can talk about scheep if we want to...

:-) scheep...? schafe! (or “schapen” in my native language)

   Anyway, the new 1x1 ‘cheeser’ slopes would be best to pad the gap, if it was the right size.

That is a pretty good idea, does someone know any example of someone using this already?

With friendly greetings, M, Moolhuysen.


Subject: 
Re: Hinge wall alignment
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.schleim
Date: 
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:01:25 GMT
Viewed: 
8317 times
  
In lugnet.build.schleim, Manfred Moolhuysen wrote:
   In lugnet.build.schleim, Jason J Railton wrote:
   Yes, but the studs were out of aschlignment. And we can talk about scheep if we want to...

:-) scheep...? schafe! (or “schapen” in my native language)

   Anyway, the new 1x1 ‘cheeser’ slopes would be best to pad the gap, if it was the right size.

That is a pretty good idea, does someone know any example of someone using this already?

With friendly greetings, M, Moolhuysen.

Mark Stafford had this Asimov-style ship



at LegoWorld that uses cheesers near the front to close the gap between the two wedges.

Jason R


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR