 | | | | | |
In lugnet.build.schleim, Manfred Moolhuysen wrote:
| |
In lugnet.build.schleim, Jason J Railton wrote:
| |
The same trick works for any length plate. You just need wall or plate
hinges at each end to hold the diagonal in place.
|
For the sake of completeness, it’s worth to mention this technique not only
works for any length, but also for any width of plate/brick. In other
words, you’re able to slant ? x 2, ? x 4 and so on by mirroring along the
diagonal as well, using an equally larger parallel ofsett.
|
Indeed. Wider bricks/plates do result in a correspondingly larger gap though.
ROSCO
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.build.schleim, I wrote:
| |
| |
For the sake of completeness, it’s worth to mention this technique not only
works for any length, but also for any width of plate/brick. In other
words, you’re able to slant ? x 2, ? x 4 and so on by mirroring along the
diagonal as well, using an equally larger parallel ofsett.
|
|
In lugnet.build.schleim, Ross Crawford answered:
| |
Indeed. Wider bricks/plates do result in a correspondingly larger gap though.
|
...that can be filled adequately by tiles or plates + tiles attached snotwise.
(Oops, I just realised I’ve put this thread back on-topic, because up until now
the discussion was most about studs on top techniques. :-)
With friendly greetings, M, Moolhuysen.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.build.schleim, Manfred Moolhuysen wrote:
| |
In lugnet.build.schleim, I wrote:
| |
| |
For the sake of completeness, it’s worth to mention this technique not only
works for any length, but also for any width of plate/brick. In other
words, you’re able to slant ? x 2, ? x 4 and so on by mirroring along the
diagonal as well, using an equally larger parallel ofsett.
|
|
In lugnet.build.schleim, Ross Crawford answered:
| |
Indeed. Wider bricks/plates do result in a correspondingly larger gap
though.
|
...that can be filled adequately by tiles or plates + tiles attached
snotwise.
(Oops, I just realised I’ve put this thread back on-topic, because up until
now the discussion was most about studs on top techniques. :-)
With friendly greetings, M, Moolhuysen.
|
Yes, but the studs were out of aschlignment. And we can talk about scheep if we
want to...
Anyway, the new 1x1 ‘cheeser’ slopes would be best to pad the gap, if it was the
right size.
Jason R
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.build.schleim, Jason J Railton wrote:
| |
Yes, but the studs were out of aschlignment. And we can talk about scheep if
we want to...
|
:-) scheep...? schafe! (or “schapen” in my native language)
| |
Anyway, the new 1x1 ‘cheeser’ slopes would be best to pad the gap, if it was
the right size.
|
That is a pretty good idea, does someone know any example of someone using this
already?
With friendly greetings, M, Moolhuysen.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.build.schleim, Manfred Moolhuysen wrote:
| |
In lugnet.build.schleim, Jason J Railton wrote:
| |
Yes, but the studs were out of aschlignment. And we can talk about scheep
if we want to...
|
:-) scheep...? schafe! (or “schapen” in my native language)
| |
Anyway, the new 1x1 ‘cheeser’ slopes would be best to pad the gap, if it was
the right size.
|
That is a pretty good idea, does someone know any example of someone using
this already?
With friendly greetings, M, Moolhuysen.
|
Mark Stafford had this Asimov-style ship
at LegoWorld that uses cheesers near the front to close the gap between the two
wedges.
Jason R
| | | | | | |
