Subject:
|
More on Micro-scale defintions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.microscale
|
Date:
|
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 04:55:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1790 times
|
| |
|
|
To see such discussion on the attributes and definitions of micro-scale is quite
exciting. I decided to open up my PowerPoint on the topic and see how I
originally defined it.
"Microfig--anything smaller than
minifig scale. May assume that a person
is the size of a 1x1 cylinder brick."
As I look back on this defintion...and read through your posts...it looks like
this still applies just fine.
For starters, the definition is politically loose and I add that it MAY assume a
person is the size of a 1x1 cylinder brick.
I agree that the best time to have the scale super-refined is when we wish to
create a collaborative layout. In the meantime, micro seems to be doing well
without many boundaries.
I encourage continued discussion on this topic as the insights add value to the
evolution of this fun scale.
Ashley
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
