| |
Todd Lehman wrote:
> OK, we're now up to 54 entries! About 90 hours left to go. Lemme know if
> there's anything on the list above that's missing or incorrect.
Since the deadline now is extended, I would like to re-enter my "search
scout" again;
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=2173
a model in the "small ships" category.
Thanks
--Tobias
|
|
| |
In lugnet.build.contests, Tobias Möller writes:
> Since the deadline now is extended, I would like to re-enter my "search
> scout" again;
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=2173
>
> a model in the "small ships" category.
OK, got it. It's listed under Small Ships.
BTW, are you sure you don't want to enter it in the Itty Bitty Polybag-Size
Ships category instead? It's at the small end of the Small Ships size, but
at ~24 pcs it's perfect for Polybag Size.
--Todd
|
|
| |
Really? I thought 24 was too much for a polybag ship...
I originally intended it as a polybag ship, but the piece count was a
little too high (or so I thought.)
Then I'll change category, to "itty bitty polybag ship"!
--Tobias
Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> In lugnet.build.contests, Tobias Möller writes:
> > Since the deadline now is extended, I would like to re-enter my "search
> > scout" again;
> >
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=2173
> >
> > a model in the "small ships" category.
>
> OK, got it. It's listed under Small Ships.
>
> BTW, are you sure you don't want to enter it in the Itty Bitty Polybag-Size
> Ships category instead? It's at the small end of the Small Ships size, but
> at ~24 pcs it's perfect for Polybag Size.
>
> --Todd
|
|
|
