| |
In lugnet.build.contests, Todd Lehman writes:
> To date, we have 26 entries from 13 entrants (PLMK if I missed anyone or if
> an entry is misplaced):
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/~1/ClassicSpaceContest/2000/Entries
OK, we're now up to 54 entries! About 90 hours left to go. Lemme know if
there's anything on the list above that's missing or incorrect.
Numbers of entries per category so far:
4 - Itty Bitty Polybag-Size Ships
11 - Small Ships
11 - Medium Ships
10 - Large Ships
5 - Utility Vechicles
2 - Walker Vehicles
1 - Small Mobile Ship Launchers <=== NEED MORE!
1 - Mobile Rocket Launchers <=== NEED MORE!
3 - Mobile Laboratories
1 - Space Bases <=== NEED MORE!
5 - The Ugliest, Wackiest Thing in Space
Have fun!!
--Todd
|
|
| |
In lugnet.build.contests, Todd Lehman writes:
> 1 - Small Mobile Ship Launchers <=== NEED MORE!
> 1 - Mobile Rocket Launchers <=== NEED MORE!
Maybe this will help remedy that:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=2220
It's a bit big for Small Mobile Ship Launchers (although I haven't counted the
pieces, but it doesn't launch a rocket, so I'll let you decide where it goes.
--Bram
Bram Lambrecht
BXL34@po.cwru.edu
http://home.cwru.edu/~bxl34/
|
|
| |
Todd Lehman wrote:
> OK, we're now up to 54 entries! About 90 hours left to go. Lemme know if
> there's anything on the list above that's missing or incorrect.
Since the deadline now is extended, I would like to re-enter my "search
scout" again;
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=2173
a model in the "small ships" category.
Thanks
--Tobias
|
|
| |
In lugnet.build.contests, Bram Lambrecht writes:
> In lugnet.build.contests, Todd Lehman writes:
> > 1 - Small Mobile Ship Launchers <=== NEED MORE!
> > 1 - Mobile Rocket Launchers <=== NEED MORE!
>
> Maybe this will help remedy that:
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=2220
>
> It's a bit big for Small Mobile Ship Launchers (although I haven't counted
> the pieces, but it doesn't launch a rocket, so I'll let you decide where
> it goes.
I think it's perfect for that category, and in retrospect I think I misnamed
the category. It was meant for mobile launchers of small ships (which yours
is) and the way it's currently worded, technically there's no place for a
large or medium-sized launcher of small ships. (IOW, yours is a medium-sized
mobile small-ship launcher. :-)
--Todd
|
|
| |
In lugnet.build.contests, Tobias Möller writes:
> Since the deadline now is extended, I would like to re-enter my "search
> scout" again;
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=2173
>
> a model in the "small ships" category.
OK, got it. It's listed under Small Ships.
BTW, are you sure you don't want to enter it in the Itty Bitty Polybag-Size
Ships category instead? It's at the small end of the Small Ships size, but
at ~24 pcs it's perfect for Polybag Size.
--Todd
|
|
| |
Really? I thought 24 was too much for a polybag ship...
I originally intended it as a polybag ship, but the piece count was a
little too high (or so I thought.)
Then I'll change category, to "itty bitty polybag ship"!
--Tobias
Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> In lugnet.build.contests, Tobias Möller writes:
> > Since the deadline now is extended, I would like to re-enter my "search
> > scout" again;
> >
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=2173
> >
> > a model in the "small ships" category.
>
> OK, got it. It's listed under Small Ships.
>
> BTW, are you sure you don't want to enter it in the Itty Bitty Polybag-Size
> Ships category instead? It's at the small end of the Small Ships size, but
> at ~24 pcs it's perfect for Polybag Size.
>
> --Todd
|
|
|
