To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.contestsOpen lugnet.build.contests in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Contests / 161
Subject: 
Re: Classic Space set design and building contest
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.space
Date: 
Wed, 1 Nov 2000 20:12:27 GMT
Viewed: 
3356 times
  
In lugnet.build.contests, Todd Lehman writes:
1.  Come up with a new classic space set design -- something that wasn't
ever released by LEGO but which fits into the classic space style.  Design
a set that looks like it might have been a real set at the time.  [...]

Some people are taking the above a little more literally than I'd intended.

I hadn't intended on encouraging hoax-style designs where people fake up
catalog scans or instruction scans complete with realistic-looking set
numbers -- although I'm certainly not opposed to this so long as:

* You document in NO UNCERTAIN TERMS (via some kind of disclaimer) on your
  entry that it is NOT A REAL SET; and

* You don't intentionally or accidentally mislead anyone into thinking it
  was a real set -- for even if you think the distinction is obvious from
  the context or the image quality, it may not be obvious to everyone; and

* You don't falsely claim that LEGO owns the copyright on your image to make
  it look more "real."

That said, I think the entries so far are absolutely outstanding, and they've
already begun to exceed my wildest expectations.  I can't wait to see what
lies in store for the next 4 weeks!

--Todd


Subject: 
RE: Classic Space set design and building contest
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.space
Date: 
Wed, 1 Nov 2000 20:35:02 GMT
Viewed: 
3106 times
  
Todd Lehman writes:
Some people are taking the above a little more literally than I'd
intended.
I hadn't intended on encouraging hoax-style designs where people fake up
catalog scans or instruction scans complete with realistic-looking set
numbers -- although I'm certainly not opposed to this so long as:

I understood that that wasn't the intention, it was just a great chance to
give my hoaxing skills a shot.  I don't think it fooled more than a couple
people.

* You don't intentionally or accidentally mislead anyone into thinking it
  was a real set -- for even if you think the distinction is obvious from
  the context or the image quality, it may not be obvious to everyone; and

Aww, it's so much more fun that way :)  (I only had one email asking me to
scan the rest of the manual:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=1822
But I'm not up to making an entire instruction booklet...)

Going off to write a disclaimer to show I can play nice,
--Bram


Bram Lambrecht
BXL34@po.cwru.edu
http://home.cwru.edu/~bxl34/


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR