Subject:
|
Re: Theft, Definitive statements vs shaping thoughts(was Re: 2001 Set info
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 Aug 2000 20:17:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5691 times
|
| |
|
|
> What you can and can't do is governed by physics, I think. :)
hehehe! (good one Todd!)
> I can't imagine that posting a link to something like what you're describing
> could get you in trouble, but then again I haven't a 100% clear picture in my
> mind of what you are contemplating, nor am I a lawyer, nor do I fully
> understand 100% what LEGO considers sensitive information.
OK, then here goes.
http://www.geocities.com/wx732/LegoSWlist.html
> I have to point out here that "fact" is in direct conflict with the "O" in
> "IMO." You might just as well ask, "Does the fact that the Moon is made of
> cheese (IMO) mean that we should go there to get cheese instead of making it
> here on Earth?"
>
>
point taken.
> Common sense might tell you, If you have to ask, it's probably not OK, or
> it's possibly something that no one knows the answer to. This doesn't mean
> you shouldn't ask -- it means you should ask -- but you shouldn't expect a
> magic-bullet answer.
No. In my line of work (Military), anything that is _NOT_ classified is free
for discussion (in other words, if you ask me what the overspeed trip of a
Solar GT is, then I will answer 22500RPM+5%, whereas if you ask me how fast the
ship goes, I will tell you: in excess of 25 kts.
The difference is that the one piece of info is _not_ covered under a NDA, and
the other is. I think that Jorge released info that is NOT covered under a NDA
between him and Target, and that LSI is bullying him into retracting it.
James
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
29 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
