Subject:
|
Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Mar 2001 08:47:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1731 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.general, William R. Ward writes:
> > > Why allow them to spread marketing-type announcements all over Lugnet?
> > > I don't get it.
> >
> > Some people posted that they were annoyed that they'd have to read
> > lugnet.lego.direct in order to find announcements that had previously
> > been in the train or legoland groups.
>
> Not necessarily. If someone in the trains group (for example) feels that
> something a LEGO employee posted about trains was relevant to a particular
> train discussion, don't worry -- you'll still hear about it. It's also a
> lot more genuine buzz when your peers excitedly draw attention to something
> outside your newsgroup than if a company puts it right there in your face.
>
> --Todd
That has to be the lamest excuse I have heard. No post can be "put in your
face". People have a choice as to what threads they want to read and not to
read. What is the difference between Jake posting a message and JimJoeBob
posting the same message? Both are saying the same thing - so that excuse is
just that, an excuse. Saying you are locking them out to create more of a
buzz is complete bs, it has to be! You did this because you wanted more
'buzz' I may have been born at night, but it was not last night.
Mark P.
mfuss903@aol.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
|
| (...) Not necessarily. If someone in the trains group (for example) feels that something a LEGO employee posted about trains was relevant to a particular train discussion, don't worry -- you'll still hear about it. It's also a lot more genuine buzz (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
232 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
