Subject:
|
Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 2 Nov 2001 03:37:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
204 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Eric Kingsley writes:
> > > Ok, I hope this does not start an avalance of requests
> > Are you OK with an avalanche of "me too" posts like this one?
>
> I too would like to take the moment to exclaim me too. :-,
>
> Perhaps a "me too" checkbox would be in order too (just kidding :-)
>
> > Either that or maybe an enhancement tracker would be nice to have.
>
> This would be really keen and everything, but it really depends on two
> things: the capability of the maintainers to make new features to LUGNET;
Yes.
> and the desire of the maintainers to implement and monitor an enhancement
> tracker.
Well I've been dinged in the past for suggesting how to implement things,
but I'll venture to offer that an enhancement request tracker doesn't have
to be NEW code and doesn't have to be done HERE. Sourceforge has a pretty
good one, all that has to be done is create a project there, I think. May
not be as convenient but may be way easier to do.
> Personally, I think it would rock if the source for LUGNET were
> opened and maintaining the site would truly become a communal effort, but
> that's really just a perfect-world scenario...
Well I think it would be interesting to hear perspective on this but it may
not be something we're meant to know. I'm just glad DanJenSteve are here,
whatever the details of what they can or can't do might be.
> Which kinda raises another issue: how are LUGNET funds doing? With the
> addition of more personnel, is there a relevant increase in expeditures?
> Should we all contribute a bit more to accomodate?
I'm hoping adding admins doesn't per se increase cost much but the question
is an excellent one.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
| (...) I too would like to take the moment to exclaim me too. :-, Perhaps a "me too" checkbox would be in order too (just kidding :-) (...) This would be really keen and everything, but it really depends on two things: the capability of the (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
