To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 9317
9316  |  9318
Subject: 
Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general
Followup-To: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Sat, 7 Jul 2001 19:09:06 GMT
Viewed: 
1891 times
  
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> 
> I'm a person who uses his international contacts/connections and credit line
> to buy in large quantity items that would otherwise languish and then
> resells them at market prices to those individuals who are not similarly
> positioned or who do not choose to spend the time and effort (and risk) to
> do so.
> 
> That includes selling things at auction, and includes using venues like eBay
> to seek market prices. I see my role as providing a valuable service rather
> than as being a criminal, thank you very much.
> 
> I have *re* set the FUT to .debate... this is not a .general topic.

WARNING!  Compartmentalized Dork-dom ahead!  ;]

Larry, I'm not sure why you're so convinced this isn't a .general
topic.  The discussion was about general "market goings-on" for
LEGO.  By its "charter", lugnet.off-topic.debate is for non-LEGO
discussions, so this doesn't belong there (well, now "here", since
I've been FUT'ed).  The charter for lugnet.general seems to be
bang-on for the topic at hand, particularly the part that says:

   "...also, community-wide discussion of experiences and
   ideas (set collection,..."

That was exactly the topic at hand---both with the anecdote about
the LEGO flea market experience, and then the LEGO buy/sell trends.
Maybe you picked up on some sub-thread forming that you felt was
part of a larger picture and not exclusively LEGO-related.  But
for the most part I felt it was discussion that was perfectly
valid in lugnet.general.

Failing that, it could have been redirected to lugnet.market.theory
I suppose, or a lugnet.debate (as in on-topic), if we actually had
one.

I just get annoyed when perfectly on-topic discussions get sent
into lugnet.off-topic.debate instead of to a more appropriate group.
People almost seem to be against (on-topic) discussions around here,
despite the obviousness of the "don't read it if you're not
interested" option.  Exercising that option is what keeps me out of
lugnet.off-topic.debate..., as long as the perfectly good on-topic
threads don't get sent there!

In an act of desperation I have X-posted and FUT'ed this post
to lugnet.admin.general  ;]  This is mostly in case anyone has
any other thoughts about on-topic discussions getting booted
into off-topic land.

KDJ
_______________________________________
LUGNETer #203, Windsor, Ontario, Canada



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts...
 
(...) You and Bryan aren't necessarily the only participants (...) Making sweeping generalisations about people who sell things, for example. I'm a person who uses his international contacts/connections and credit line to buy in large quantity items (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

10 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR