 | | Re: My Stance —Matthew Moulton
| | | | On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:32:59 GMT, "Mike Stanley" <cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com> wrote: Mike, when you talk about my webpage you are talking about my home. In my home I express myself the way I want. Granted I was wrong to try and advertise the opinions in (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | (canceled) —Mike Stanley
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: My Stance —Paul Baulch
| | | | | Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) Oh, well done, Mike. Just slipped out, did it? Doesn't really cast a good light on your whole stance regarding Matthew's recent transgressions, now does it? Perhaps you should APOLOGISE TO MATTHEW RIGHT (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: My Stance —Mike Stanley
| | | | | (...) Sorry, I'm in debate mode right now and that's not what we need. I just deleted a fairly lengthy response in which I defended my actions (namecalling in this case) as acceptable for various reasons, but I don't want to post that, because more (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: My Stance —Paul Baulch
| | | | | Apology accepted, Mike. That's all I ever see is necessary. Cheers, Paul Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) (namecalling (...) on (...) he (...) caused (...) learned (...) it (...) the (...) (24 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
