Subject:
|
Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 2 Apr 2000 05:48:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3646 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> potential weaknesses? (Try to stump it!)
The checker should equate the following IMHO:
|_ L
+ t
< k
~ n
\/ V
() O or 0
"\/()+eF0rMe" (Vote for Me) for example gives a 788% success rate.
"|_uGn3+" which is a complicated way to write "Lugnet" passes with 481%
"|_eGoBr|<K5" (LegoBricks) passes with 794%
Just some thoughts...
I found it interesting that the password "100%" comes out as -666% secure. So,
in other words, perfect = evil :)
Ben Roller
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
