Subject:
|
Re: Automated password appraisal (Re: New feature: Article rating)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:15:31 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
3440 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000 22:42:11 GMT, Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> > > I don't know if this really is a bad password, but I
> > > couldn't resist trying it:
> > >
> > > 2x4=3001
> > >
> > > Another lost password choosing algorithm :-(
> >
> > Ooh -- I'd better make sure that it dislikes [0-9]+[xX][0-9]+ and [0-9]{4} .
>
> OK, try that again now. Seeing that this site is LEGO-related, it's best to
> treat "x" and "X" as part of numeric stuff. In fact there are many other
> things besides 'x' and '=' which are numeric-related. :-o
>
> It now very much dislikes numerical and/or mathematical substrings (the longer
> the worse) consisting of two or more of the following characters:
>
> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 : . , + - * / x X # % < = > $ ¢ £ ¤ ¥
>
> --Todd
You might want to add ^ for exponentiation. I just posted a list passwords
that passed, including 4 variations of the Theory of Relativity.
Rob
-
Rob Farver - mailto:rfarver@rcn.com
http://www.farver.com/lego/
http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/rfarver
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
