To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 12150
12149  |  12151
Subject: 
Re: "fired"?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:24:48 GMT
Viewed: 
1069 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, David Eaton wrote:
In lugnet.admin.general, Ken Nagel wrote:
I wasn't trying to keep it a secret however it wasn't up to a Lugnet
administrator to violate the TOU and raise it up the flag pole.

This seems a bit misplaced... How did Larry violate the TOU? > DaveE

I've addressed this complete with quotes from Lugnet polocies and updates. It's
not a debate.

Ken



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: "fired"?
 
(...) Yes it is, for I didn't see a violation and, again my interpretation, you mis-applying the TOS does not make it right, so it is up for a debate. But again, that's just my stance. Further, in my opinion, you seem to be very selective as to what (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: "fired"?
 
(...) This seems a bit misplaced... How did Larry violate the TOU? By bringing up your employment? By correcting the library's wording? By saying that he didn't think you were the one responsible for the wording? For a few grammar and spelling (...) (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

17 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR