Subject:
|
Re: The whole story?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:19:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
576 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
Assuming that’s actually why he was terminated. Everyone is jumping to the
conclusion that they have the whole story, all the facts. As we have seen so
many times before, that may not be the case. There may be more to this than
that. Who knows? Certainly, none of us do. And I’m not sure that LEGO HR is
necessarily going to explain why they terminated someone, in detail, for
privacy reasons.
|
You are pathetic. I guess your apology wasn’t worth the keystrokes it took to
enter it. The manager had in his hands printouts of my posts.
| |
Ken is going around saying “that administrator” “outed” him. Without going
into whether that terminology
|
I don’t have to say it. It’s there for everyone to refere back to.
| |
he shared
unannounced product information, information that hasn’t been seen
anywhere else as I recall. Might have missed it, but I do get to a LOT of
places.
|
That info came from another web site. The web site included item numbers,
release dates and some picts. Perhaps you need to get out more.
| |
I think if there are further apologies warranted, that they need to come from
Ken. His actions here in this thread are out of line.
|
Again “some pigs are more equal than other pigs” I could care less about your
apology. You’ve just proven that worthless. As I stated you owe an apology to
the library and NILTC.
| |
And, for another thing, I’m at a loss as to why he mailed all the admins(2)
except me? Why not start with me first?
|
Because you are the pompus one that posted it in the first place.
| |
++Lar
1 - for those keeping score at home, I counted several ToS violations in this
thread by him so far.
|
However your original violations don’t count. That brings us back to george
Orwell....
| |
2 - as it turned out, the address he used for Kelly wasn’t forwarded (oops!
our bad, Todd has fixed it now) the mail to Matt went into his spam
filter(3), and Matt is a new father today(4) so was a bit preoccupied this
week, the address Ken used for Todd isn’t checked that often and gets a lot
of mail (oops again! our bad, but there you are), Frank was preoccupied (our
bad again!) and we haven’t heard from Lenny about whether he got it or not,
but we know he went on holiday early this week and doesn’t have email access.
As it turns out, the only person that would probably have gotten it and
responded right away was me, but he left me off the list. For whatever
reason.
|
Matt was already making excuses and mentioned none of this.
Ken
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: The whole story?
|
| Snipped a lot of stuff to get to the crux. (...) So you're not denying that you did in fact pass around unannounced information? (regardless of source, it was unannounced, right?) (...) Irrelevant. Was it unannounced at the time? If so, are you (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | Re: The whole story?
|
| (...) wow, I guess I've been away for a while. I'm not even following this thread - I read only Lar's and this one. But it's enough for me to see that there's rudeness being flung toward those who deserve the community's respect. This is directed at (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !!
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | The whole story?
|
| (...) Assuming that's actually why he was terminated. Everyone is jumping to the conclusion that they have the whole story, all the facts. As we have seen so many times before, that may not be the case. There may be more to this than that. Who (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
